If you shoot UHD on the BMPCC4K, you get better results using the Metabones SpeedBooster for BMPCC4K. You may get satisfactory results with the Metabones SpeedBooster for BMPCC4K that has a focal reduction of 0.71x like the Ultra with fall-off in the corners.ġ.9x 0.71x = 1.35x will darkening corners at 18mm.

The combination of that lens and the 0.64x SpeedBooster is too much though for the BMPCC4K.ġ.9x 0.64x = 1.25x and a strong vignette results. It will work quite well with perhaps a fall-off in the corners when used on a Super 35 traditional sensor with a ‘crop’ of 1.42-1.45x. That’s fine if you have a 135 film ‘full frame’ lens, but the Signa 18-35mm is officially an APS-C lens, but it does have an image circle of 28.4mm. Photo camera to replace my 600D (which still works just fine, but I wouldn't want to bring both)Īutofocus (I can make do without, but I guess it might be nice sometimes)ĭo you reckon the difference in image quality is sufficient to warrant choosing the bmpcc 4k over a DSLR? (Yes this is a subjective question, looking for wrote:The Metabones SpeedBooster for BMCC has a focal reduction factor of 0.64x, like the current XL.

However, I can't quite pin down the reason - maybe it's just because people using a bmpcc4k are more serious about videography, and therefore make better videos?Īlternatives would be Canon R7, R6 (I already have some old glass after all, to use with a converter) or even a Sony or something. I have a bunch of EF and EF-S lenses, but nothing fancy.ĭR Studio license, which I'd probably have to buy myself otherwise at some pointįrom the videos I've seen online, all other cameras in the same price range don't look quite as good.

I would use only minimal accessories: ssd with mount, 1-2 lenses, batteries, tripod. Lots of 4-season hiking is involved, so size and weight, as well as resistance to low temperatures, are relevant. I'm considering getting a bmpcc 4k as travel camera.

Bmpcc 4k reddit